A non-psychological account of sexual perversion, one closer to folk biology, claims that only reproduction allows us to distinguish perversions from non-perversions Ruddick Scheer, Robert, "Bigger Breasts: But to carry it out a person would have to will its execution, and even deliberately overcome any moral qualms about doing so. A sex act can be good or bad depending on the amount and intensity of the pleasure or pain it provides Vannoy Because the above view relies solely on sexual pleasure-as-sensation, it would have to understand the other two types ultimately in terms of pleasure-as-sensation.
We think of sexual activity as neither obligatory nor supererogatory, but as permissible in that if the participants agree to the act, this is the end of the story. Philosophy and Sex, Buffalo, NY: Returning to sexual orientation, its popular conception relies on dubious assumptions Corvino a; Dembroff It is unclear whether objectification can consist of mere mental regard or whether it must have a treatment component ogling someone is interesting because it is unclear whether it is treatment or mere regard. Sexual activity can … be defined as activity that tends to fulfill sexual desire, while sexual desire is sufficiently defined as the desire for certain bodily pleasures, period. This does not mean that the pleasure view of sexual desire is correct, only that its aim or strategy need not be misguided. Casual sex, watching pornography, catcalling, ogling, and other examples all allegedly involve sexual objectification. There is also the thought that relationships do not escape the power of desire: Anyone who prefers heterosexual oral sex to intercourse would be perverted. Desires and fantasies are obvious candidates. Simple Truths about a Complex Emotion, Oxford: Wininger eds , Amherst, NY: Wininger, and Frederick A. And in this experience are complex emotions of both pleasure and violation. Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, trans. That is, what makes sexual pleasure-as-enjoyment sexual is its connection to arousal. Moreover, sexual pleasure seems to be the primary motive for sexual activity: It eroticizes patriarchal ways of viewing women, so that sexual desire becomes infused with dominance cf. If two people who, without taking off their clothes, kiss, rub, and tug at each other, all the while feeling sexual pleasure, their act is sexual. If it does, it is probably sexual pleasure, as-sensation or as-enjoyment, a pleasure that provides people with the main motive for having sex, often with drastic consequences. Related to this, essentialism has to be universally true for it to be true at all, for if it excludes some cultures and times, it concedes the truth of social constructionism. Sexual optimism claims that although sexual desire can be morally dangerous, it need not be and is usually not. The Philosophy of Sex and Love: Indeed, a parent might want to instill in their child the ability to be sexually experienced, so might coerce the child into sex on occasion, much like parents coerce their children into activities deemed good for them Benatar Thus, there is no room for people who are gender fluid or whose gender or sex identification exists outside the binary Dembroff
Video about philosophy of sex and love:
Philosophy of Love and Sex
SyntaxTextGen not activated